Select Page

The economy keeps shrinking, or does it really?

The economy keeps shrinking, or does it really?

So the second quarter Gross Domestic Product statistics threw us all a curved ball. Contracting by another 1.7%, year on year, it re-inforced our worst fears that a so-called tailspin is unavoidable.

However, there are a few points I want to lift out to place the quarterly data in perspective.

The first is that the first quarter contraction has been revised upwards (less negative) from -2.7% to -1.7%. For the layman this looks like a one percent adjustment but that is a percentage point. For those so inclined, it is worth taking note that this is actually a 37% adjustment.

The second important consideration is that only four sectors contracted. Were it not for construction, wholesale/retail, hotels & restaurants, and fishing, chances are excellent that we would have had a positive second quarter.

In the third place, we need to consider the overbearing impact of only two components.

Construction, for instance did not contract by a five or a ten percent but by a whopping 52%. That alone indicates that the overall or average is highly distorted. But it is not as if the problems in construction are new or unexpected, they are more or less what we anticipated. I am concerned about this figure but at some point the sector will normalise if it has not done so already.

One must not forget that construction was heavily bloated after six years of unprecedented stoking. At some point consolidation became inevitable although I am the first person to acknowledge that it would have been less damaging and disruptive if the government had planned and executed better.

While the gravy train was running, every second bricklayer became a contractor, received a tender or a sub-contract, and pocketed the benefits. Now the chickens have come home to roost, both for the government and for the fly-by-nights and only the serious players will remain. Then we will have a normal construction sector contributing its normal share to GDP. That will be before the end of the year.

The sub-component that also distorts the headline figure is the decline in new vehicle sales of almost 25%. This was also according to trend and I would not be too concerned. Vehicle sales are still more or less the same by volume as in 2012/2013, so it is more rational to strip the 2014 to 2016 data out of the graph and form an opinion of what is reasonable for vehicle sales under “normal” uninflated conditions.

The only sector contraction that really worries me is fishing which shrunk by 10%. I do not know why this is so as I am unaware of any adverse climate or bio-source conditions, other than those we know of. I am wondering if the fiddling with fishing rights and quotas is not perhaps the most important contributing factor but I am only spiffballing, I do not now for sure.

When an economy declines, it is usually after robust growth or after a serious disruption. We have had both. So, while there was already a noticeable decline quarter on quarter between the first and second quarters in 2016, GDP growth was still positive. The real bollies only hit the fan in the third quarter last year. Were one to present this on a graph, it will be a simple parabolic curve with the trough somewhere between the third and fourth quarters last year.

For this reason, when an economy is on the mend, it is better to compare the quarters as mirror images pivoting around the trough. So, a more useful comparison is to compare the first quarter of 2017 with the last quarter of 2016, back to back, or quarter on quarter to be technically more correct. This approach requires then that the second quarter 2017 must be compared to the third quarter of 2016.

Following conventional statistics and economics of comparing first to first and second to second, leads to a distorted view under current conditions. Remember, for the first quarter of last year, the gravy train was still steaming ahead full steam. The first two quarters of this year, definitely not.

If it is any consolation, we are now at the end of a low base period which means even meagre growth in the third quarter will appear bigger than the real trend. The third quarter 2016 was so bad, even a poor third quarter 2017 should statistically appear to be better.

And finally, let us wait for the third quarter stats before we go all doom and gloom. When those are published, the second quarter data will have been updated and revised, and then maybe, even the second quarter would not be so bad.

I am ten times more concerned about the astronomical rise in Namfisa levies than about the economy. The economy is on the mend and I agree with the finance minister, there are green shoots everywhere.


Special acknowledgement to the Economics Association of Namibia and to PSG Research for leaning in part on their respective analyses.


 

 

About The Author

Daniel Steinmann

Brief CV of Daniel Steinmann. Born 24 February 1961, Johannesburg. Educated at the University of Pretoria: BA, BA(hons), BD. Postgraduate degrees are in Philosophy and Divinity. Editor of the Namibia Economist since 1991. Daniel Steinmann has steered the Economist as editor for the past 29 years. The Economist started as a monthly free-sheet, then moved to a weekly paper edition (1996 to 2016), and on 01 December 2016 to a daily digital newspaper at www.economist.com.na. It is the first Namibian newspaper to go fully digital. Daniel Steinmann is an authority on macro-economics having established a sound record of budget analysis, strategic planning and assessing the impact of policy formulation. For eight years, he hosted a weekly talk-show on NBC Radio, explaining complex economic concepts to a lay audience in a relaxed, conversational manner. He was a founding member of the Editors' Forum of Namibia. Over the years, he has mentored hundreds of journalism students as interns and as young professional jourlists. He regularly helps economics students, both graduate and post-graduate, to prepare for examinations and moderator reviews. He is the Namibian respondent for the World Economic Survey conducted every quarter for the Ifo Center for Business Cycle Analysis and Surveys at the University of Munich in Germany. He is frequently consulted by NGOs and international analysts on local economic trends and developments. Send comments to daniel@economist.com.na

Following reverse listing, public can now acquire shareholding in Paratus Namibia

Promotion

20 February 2020, Windhoek, Namibia: Paratus Namibia Holdings (PNH) was founded as Nimbus Infrastructure Limited (“Nimbus”), Namibia’s first Capital Pool Company listed on the Namibian Stock Exchange (“NSX”).

Although targeting an initial capital raising of N$300 million, Nimbus nonetheless managed to secure funding to the value of N$98 million through its CPC listing. With a mandate to invest in ICT infrastructure in sub-Sahara Africa, it concluded management agreements with financial partner Cirrus and technology partner, Paratus Telecommunications (Pty) Ltd (“Paratus Namibia”).

Paratus Namibia Managing Director, Andrew Hall

Its first investment was placed in Paratus Namibia, a fully licensed communications operator in Namibia under regulation of the Communications Regulatory Authority of Namibia (CRAN). Nimbus has since been able to increase its capital asset base to close to N$500 million over the past two years.

In order to streamline further investment and to avoid duplicating potential ICT projects in the market between Nimbus and Paratus Namibia, it was decided to consolidate the operations.

Publishing various circulars to shareholders, Nimbus took up a 100% shareholding stake in Paratus Namibia in 2019 and proceeded to apply to have its name changed to Paratus Namibia Holdings with a consolidated board structure to ensure streamlined operations between the capital holdings and the operational arm of the business.

This transaction was approved by the Competitions Commission as well as CRAN, following all the relevant regulatory approvals as well as the necessary requirements in terms of corporate governance structures.

Paratus Namibia has evolved as a fully comprehensive communications operator in Namibia and operates as the head office of the Paratus Group in Africa. Paratus has established a pan-African footprint with operations in six African countries, being: Angola, Botswana, Mozambique, Namibia, South Africa and Zambia.

The group has achieved many successes over the years of which more recently includes the building of the Trans-Kalahari Fibre (TKF) project, which connects from the West Africa Cable System (WACS) eastward through Namibia to Botswana and onward to Johannesburg. The TKF also extends northward through Zambia to connect to Dar es Salaam in Tanzania, which made Paratus the first operator to connect the west and east coast of Africa under one Autonomous System Number (ASN).

This means that Paratus is now “exporting” internet capacity to landlocked countries such as Zambia, Botswana, the DRC with more countries to be targeted, and through its extensive African network, Paratus is well-positioned to expand the network even further into emerging ICT territories.

PNH as a fully-listed entity on the NSX, is therefore now the 100% shareholder of Paratus Namibia thereby becoming a public company. PNH is ready to invest in the future of the ICT environment in Namibia. The public is therefore invited and welcome to acquire shares in Paratus Namibia Holdings by speaking to a local stockbroker registered with the NSX. The future is bright, and the opportunities are endless.